3 ms·
And the DoJ stopped fighting. If the DoJ ultimately won the case, then it's fair that Apple should have to pay their legal costs. But since using a 200 year o
by Johnny555 11y ago
And the DoJ stopped fighting.
If the DoJ ultimately won the case, then it's fair that Apple should have to pay their legal costs.
But since using a 200 year old law to force Apple to do work they don't want to do was a legal stretch, if the DoJ lost the case then again I'd say the DoJ should pay Apple's legal costs.
- teacup50 11y agoThe law in question was passed the same week that congress submitted the fourth amendment. Please stop parroting "200 year old law".
- Johnny555 11y agoOh, you mean in 1789, 227 years ago?
- teacup50 11y agoYes. The same week that the fourth amendment -- which is what provides us with strong protection against unreasonable search and seizure -- was approved by Congress. Or do you refer to that as a stale 200 year old law, too?
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]