4 ms·
You misunderstand. My point is lowglow would not have given those things weight. So even with perfect 20/20 hindsight, we know that based on his 8 criteria he
by logicallee 11y ago
You misunderstand. My point is lowglow would not have given those things weight. So even with perfect 20/20 hindsight, we know that based on his 8 criteria he would have Facebook a No thanks.
(More specifically, he wouldn't have given them the time of day or even so much as returned an email, a 0/10 across 8 categories means that it's not worth so much as a reply.)
EDIT: I didn't realize you're lowglow. My point stands. You need better investment criteria :)
- lowglow 11y agoWhich is why I said "loose" criteria, not a rigid ruleset. ::)