> This appears to be blatantly moving the goal posts. It doesn't actually matter. All we care about are values by %. So we can say that someone in the first 5%

> This appears to be blatantly moving the goal posts. It doesn't actually matter. All we care about are values by %. So we can say that someone in the first 5% of humans could have done this same calculation and been wrong. And that's okay. If it turns out that we are in the first 5% of humans, then we too are wrong. That's a risk we're willing to take, and statistically, it doesn't matter. It allows us to make informed decisions right now.