5 ms·

Money is an IOU. That is a promise of something. When the fed create money is a liability for them: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_frliabil

Money is an IOU. That is a promise of something. When the fed create money is a liability for them: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_frliabilities.htm https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_frliabilit... When you pay taxes, that liability is cancelled. The circle has to begin somewhere, and it begins and end with the government.

AnimalMuppet 11y ago
That doesn't seem to answer my question. When the Fed prints currency (not yet sending it to a depository institution), they (the Fed) created an asset. They also, if you and bubbleRefuge and cs702 are correct, create a liability, so that everything nets out to zero. My question: who does the Fed owe the liability to?
- RobertoG 11y ago
  The Fed create money spending it. They don't create money and then spend it. The government owe the liability to whoever come backs with that money to pay something (taxes normally). It will accept it as payment.
sorokod 11y ago
> Money is an IOU. That is a promise of something. What is that something?
- skylan_q 11y ago
  It used to be gold. Now it is $1 USD for $1 USD.
  - AnimalMuppet 11y ago
    That's kind of tautological. In particular, if you don't buy the whole premise (that dollar bills are US government liabilities), then RobertoG's statement (that "Money is an IOU. That is a promise of something.") is completely unconvincing by itself, without further support. And your "support" is not very helpful.
    - ellius 11y ago
      That's the point though: in some sense it's a circular house of cards. I linked this Edward Harrison piece higher up. Read the first paragraph and think about it for a minute. This is all a dollar really is, and its inherent, fundamental value is nothing other than that it allows you to pay taxes: https://www.creditwritedowns.com/2011/10/currency-revulsion-2.html https://www.creditwritedowns.com/2011/10/currency-revulsion-...
      - sorokod 11y ago
        A central point here is the statement that money has no intrinsic value, saying "Money is an IOU" may be understood to mean that, but in a very awkward way, it seem to suggest that something deeper is going on here.

AnimalMuppet 11y ago

That doesn't seem to answer my question. When the Fed prints currency (not yet sending it to a depository institution), they (the Fed) created an asset. They also, if you and bubbleRefuge and cs702 are correct, create a liability, so that everything nets out to zero. My question: who does the Fed owe the liability to?

RobertoG 11y ago
The Fed create money spending it. They don't create money and then spend it. The government owe the liability to whoever come backs with that money to pay something (taxes normally). It will accept it as payment.

sorokod 11y ago

> Money is an IOU. That is a promise of something. What is that something?

skylan_q 11y ago
It used to be gold. Now it is $1 USD for $1 USD.
- AnimalMuppet 11y ago
  That's kind of tautological. In particular, if you don't buy the whole premise (that dollar bills are US government liabilities), then RobertoG's statement (that "Money is an IOU. That is a promise of something.") is completely unconvincing by itself, without further support. And your "support" is not very helpful.
  - ellius 11y ago
    That's the point though: in some sense it's a circular house of cards. I linked this Edward Harrison piece higher up. Read the first paragraph and think about it for a minute. This is all a dollar really is, and its inherent, fundamental value is nothing other than that it allows you to pay taxes: https://www.creditwritedowns.com/2011/10/currency-revulsion-2.html https://www.creditwritedowns.com/2011/10/currency-revulsion-...
    - sorokod 11y ago
      A central point here is the statement that money has no intrinsic value, saying "Money is an IOU" may be understood to mean that, but in a very awkward way, it seem to suggest that something deeper is going on here.