3 ms·
The movie suggests that the central government directly manufactures an initial amount of money to be put into circulation by issuing debt that is bought by the
by aklein 11y ago
The movie suggests that the central government directly manufactures an initial amount of money to be put into circulation by issuing debt that is bought by the central bank. The proceeds are deposited at commercial banks, who then lend money out to the maximum extent allowed under fractional bank lending requirements.
This paper argues that in reality, the relationship is exactly the reverse: most money (=debt) creation starts as loans between private commercial banks. Loans become deposits in other bank accounts. If a bank finds itself short on a reserve requirement, it can just borrow reserves from other banks to meet its reserves, or from the central bank.
In sum, at least in the United States and England, most money creation stems from loans within the private sector, as opposed to what the movie and textbooks typically suggest.
This is explained in the paper:
" For the [money multiplier] theory to hold, the amount of reserves must be a binding constraint on lending, and the
central bank must directly determine the amount of reserves.
While the money multiplier theory can be a useful way of
introducing money and banking in economic textbooks, it is
not an accurate description of how money is created in reality.
Rather than controlling the quantity of reserves, central banks
today typically implement monetary policy by setting the
price of reserves — that is, interest rates.
In reality, neither are reserves a binding constraint on lending,
nor does the central bank fix the amount of reserves that are
available. As with the relationship between deposits and
loans, the relationship between reserves and loans typically
operates in the reverse way to that described in some
economics textbooks. Banks first decide how much to lend
depending on the profitable lending opportunities available to
them — which will, crucially, depend on the interest rate set
by the Bank of England. It is these lending decisions that
determine how many bank deposits are created by the banking
system. The amount of bank deposits in turn influences how
much central bank money banks want to hold in reserve (to
meet withdrawals by the public, make payments to other
banks, or meet regulatory liquidity requirements), which is
then, in normal times, supplied on demand by the Bank of
England. The rest of this article discusses these practices in
more detail."
- sedeki 11y agoThank you!
- branchless 11y agoand most of that lending (money creation) is against land, not businesses. UK: http://bsd.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Sectoral-Lending.png http://bsd.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Sectoral-...
- alanwatts 11y ago>In sum, at least in the United States and England, most money creation stems from loans within the private sector, as opposed to what the movie and textbooks typically suggest. I'm having trouble finding it at the moment but I remember reading a while back on the Federal Reserve's FAQ section about this. They were actually quite explicit about this, stating that if one of the big banks went under they would bail it out by printing what they needed, like they did in 2008. It is a bizarre design