3 ms·

I had exactly the same reaction. There are more screenshots of their previous look in other posts: https://gitbucket.github.io/gitbucket-news/images/gitbucket-

• deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
• sheeshkebab 11y ago
  Not defending the ui aping, but GH css is open source: http://primercss.io/layout/ http://primercss.io/layout/ They should have kept it proprietary if their lawyers are touchy about liberal open source licenses. >Open source Available for use under the MIT license and built with open source projects like SCSS, Jekyll, Grunt, and more.
  • jerf 11y ago
    Open source covers the copyright. This is more a trademark issue. The trademark issue is independent of the copyright-openness of their assets, as it is not valid to infringe their trademark either with their assets, or with fully copyright-independent assets.
    • stingraycharles 11y ago
      This is correct and highlighted by the fact that Github doesn't focus on the CSS at all -- their claim would have been exactly the same if they did not copy anything and wrote everything from scratch. It's about trademark and user confusion, not copyright.
• FiloSottile 11y ago
  The first URL is gitbucket[.]github[.]io/gitbucket-news/images/gitbucket-3.12/new-github-ui.png, just saying.