3 ms·
Really Gitbucket should seek to change their UX. Not just the UI. Right now gitbucket looks like a functional clone of github, that's bad. It's possible to app
by tenken 11y ago
Really Gitbucket should seek to change their UX. Not just the UI. Right now gitbucket looks like a functional clone of github, that's bad.
It's possible to appear different, but retain feature-set it's just hard. And obvisously -- I think, you could bundle a legacy Github theme as an addon to gitbucket provided by the community if you really wanted to. Just not ship the product out the door as a 100% clone of github, UI and all.
- blister 11y agoBut... GitBucket is a project that is trying to be a Scala-based clone of GitHub. That's what their project is about. They're trying to copy the look and feel of GitHub because that's exactly what they're trying to do. It (to me) would be like Microsoft asking LibreOffice to change their look and feel because it looks too similar to MS Office. LibreOffice is SUPPOSED to look like MS Office so that users can switch without much pain. Right?