Okaaaaaaay, so if we left everything what OOP gived us (properties^1, generics, lot of good patterns^2, lot of abstractions for generic things, like interface^3

Okaaaaaaay, so if we left everything what OOP gived us (properties^1, generics, lot of good patterns^2, lot of abstractions for generic things, like interface^3, events, higher level datastructures, delegates, namespaces, modules^4 etc.) then we get C? Omg, thank you Captian Obvious! Learn OOP first. What a bullshit article. 1) C++ for OO example? Seriously, why??? Grab a modern language who have properties at least. Even Delphi had it! 2) IMHO without OO patterns OOP worth nothing 3) I know, you can do interfaces in C++ with pure virtual classes, but you miss the abstraction behind that. 4) Java JAR, .NET assemblies, no matter what they called.