3 ms·
Hm... An article with no concrete proof. Then, here is my story about Apple vs FBI (sceptical too). FBI (really, NSA) knows of only one phone (company) that i
by pksadiq 11y ago
Hm... An article with no concrete proof.
Then, here is my story about Apple vs FBI (sceptical too).
FBI (really, NSA) knows of only one phone (company) that is easily crackable, and its IPhone.
So Why a sue?
This has to be taken utmost care. When FBI sues against Apple, and they say they can't crack (some say, hack), people think that its true, and they trust more in Iphone. Result: More sales for Iphone. FBI (NSA) has more phones crackable. Benefit is for both.
So Why Android is less crackable? Answer: It's not. But a user can easily replace it OS with something safe (like, another android like replcant OS). So, FBI (NSA) shall have to try harder to break into.
So why not windows phone? Hm... You should not store any obsolete data in your mind.
Thank you.
- RubyPinch 11y agoexcept the FBI changed course, not only saying that the iphone was hackable, but that it was hackable by groups other than the government, which, if someone valued their privacy, they would probably find that statement concerning