5 ms·
A value, with a type. Nothing else. Stop highjacking everything into your OO religion. If you take everything of a value that originated elsewhere, there will b
by sklogic 11y ago
A value, with a type. Nothing else. Stop highjacking everything into your OO religion. If you take everything of a value that originated elsewhere, there will be nothing left in the OOD.
- heartsucker 11y ago> Stop highjacking everything into your OO religion. The parent to your post seemed to have a legitimate question, and you're being snarky. You could have left out everything after the first sentence or even explained what that means in practice.
- sklogic 11y agoIt was a bad argument disguised as a "question". I rarely tolerate this sort of a discourse.
- exprx 11y agoA value with a type is an object? What else do we need? “Methods”? Why? I very strongly support the proposed Unified call syntax.
- sklogic 11y agoThe word "object" comes loaded with a shit ton of ideology. There is absolutely no need to rename the long established terms to simply please a bunch of religious zealots.
- scomment 11y agoOkay, now give me some collection like object, who can handle everything. No, don't use void*. There are some benefits if everything is an object, like generics.
- dang 11y agoMany of your comments have been breaking the HN guidelines. Please stop being uncivil and calling names. You clearly know enough to make substantive contributions, which is great for this forum, but it you keep being rude, we'll have to ban you. So please don't. We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11373716 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11373716 and marked it off-topic.