> Treating "balance" like an implicit good is garbage. News organizations should have editors with enough judgement, and courage, to choose which arguments meri

> Treating "balance" like an implicit good is garbage. News organizations should have editors with enough judgement, and courage, to choose which arguments merit airtime. There's a difference between silencing your opponents, and refusing to give airtime to people when you can't even decide whether they are ignorant or pursuing some unstated agenda. I completely agree, and thanks so much for clarifying; I hope I didn't come across as snarky!