3 ms·
Hi, Thanks for your comment! We really meant /24 :-) because this is not shared among networks. As we are targeting small/medium shops we don't need to have a
by NetStrikeForce 11y ago
Hi,
Thanks for your comment!
We really meant /24 :-) because this is not shared among networks. As we are targeting small/medium shops we don't need to have a full /16 or /10 for each network they create.
By using the IP space reserved for carrier grade NAT we're aiming to avoid any overlapping with RFC1918 networks in as many cases as possible. We've found that most of our prospective customers are in RFC1918 space, which was expected.
On the other hand, providing an option to configure your own DHCP settings is on the roadmap - in the meanwhile we're happy to accommodate any needs by manually changing the settings under request or even completely disabling DHCP. The network is layer 2, so you can do whatever you want with your layer 3 settings :-)
Hope our choice makes a bit more sense now, but we would definitely want to hear more detail about your concerns with the chosen IP space.
Thanks!