3 ms·
"they really have solved the problem of creating a generic blockchain which can have anything else built on top of it." No, actually they haven't. Try and expl
by bachback 11y ago
"they really have solved the problem of creating a generic blockchain which can have anything else built on top of it."
No, actually they haven't. Try and explain how a distributed system should be Turing complete in a scientific paper and you'd notice its not possible. Eventually this will be discovered and this blockchain will implode. The centralised team doesn't even claim that the chain will last - they want to migrate to PoS.
- nlightcho 11y agoAll Turing complete systems used in practice are distributed at some scale so your argument is non-sense.
- bachback 11y agohuh? Computers on the Internet don't coordinate like nodes in a P2P blockchain. Bitcoin's script is limited to a simple stack language for a very good reason.
- drdeca 11y agoI don't understand what you are saying is impossible about this. Are you just saying "try it and be really careful about it and you will see that it is impossible"? Because I don't see why that claim should be convincing without, saying why? (Maybe I missed some other comment of yours?)