4 ms·
I'm not sure I understand what your use case is for pushing static routes & would be interested to understand what you mean. I've been trying a few different a
by DanielDent 11y ago
I'm not sure I understand what your use case is for pushing static routes & would be interested to understand what you mean.
I've been trying a few different approaches to routing. Putting link-local addresses in routing tables has worked well in some deployments.
Debian & OS X use MAC based addresses in addition to their privacy addresses. https://www.danieldent.com/blog/remote-ipv6-device-fingerprinting/ https://www.danieldent.com/blog/remote-ipv6-device-fingerpri...
- mirimir 11y agoI'm pushing static routes over OpenVPN tap to get IPv6 assigned to remote LANs. In my (very limited) experience, the MAC-based IPv6 don't reach the Internet (http://test-ipv6.com http://test-ipv6.com for example). However, they do get revealed via WebRTC in Firefox (default install). IE and Safari block WebRTC by default.
- DanielDent 11y agoMy testing has shown they are accessible over the internet :(. They are not marked as 'preferred' and won't be used by default. But they are still available for use if someone goes out of their way to do so.
- mirimir 11y agoThanks. I was going from http://test-ipv6.com/ http://test-ipv6.com/. Unless the "privacy" address is routed, it reports no IPv6 connectivity. I'm guessing that ping6 should find them, right?