> I have to think the scientist went to stringent lengths to eliminate as many confounds and variables given how strong they claim the link is. Having worked i

> I have to think the scientist went to stringent lengths to eliminate as many confounds and variables given how strong they claim the link is. Having worked in academic science, I can assure you, every scientist tries to make their findings sound strong. > Just because they don't know the mechanism doesn't mean it should not be taken seriously. True. There are many things for which we get good evidence before knowing the mechanisms. But here, I'm not sure the evidence is that good, which is why I think a suggested mechanism of action would go a long way.