3 ms·

Uhm. Bodycams -- specifically that term, "bodycams" -- have exactly one context right now, and that's the context in which law enforcement wears them while on d

Uhm. Bodycams -- specifically that term, "bodycams" -- have exactly one context right now, and that's the context in which law enforcement wears them while on duty. And I do think that bodycams are a great thing that should be required as part of being a law enforcement officer on duty. You still haven't explained yourself beyond the same old "what you record can be used against you" argument, which as I've said before, is weak. I think this will be my last reply, since there is absolutely nothing being gained here in this discussion.

dogma1138 11y ago
The simple argument is that if you were involved in an accident with a dashboard camera it can be used against you, if you tamper with it after you are stepping into the territory of spoliation of evidence. Ask any lawyer and they'll give you a golden rule - do not create records that might be used against you unless you are compelled to do so. If you have a dashboard camera then know the risks and mitigate them as I've mentioned before having a camera that overrides it's footage after a short period is good enough simply because you then need to perform a deliberate act to save that footage this reduces the liability that a dashboard camera can present in cases where it might have recorded something you might not want to become public. Furthermore dashboard cameras that do not record sound in the cabin are also preferable because the last thing you want is you on record being distracted by arguing with a passenger or switching radio station or bad mouthing some driver that cut you off and those things are considerably more common than people think.
- TheSpiceIsLife 11y ago
  A dashcam that overwrites footage in a short period may be of no use if you're unable to stop the recording because you've been injured in an accident. And anyway, if I'm at fault and that is recorded on the camera then that is okay with me. The camera will at least give an indisputable account of the events it recorded, whereas our human memories can be ... inaccurate.

dogma1138 11y ago

The simple argument is that if you were involved in an accident with a dashboard camera it can be used against you, if you tamper with it after you are stepping into the territory of spoliation of evidence. Ask any lawyer and they'll give you a golden rule - do not create records that might be used against you unless you are compelled to do so. If you have a dashboard camera then know the risks and mitigate them as I've mentioned before having a camera that overrides it's footage after a short period is good enough simply because you then need to perform a deliberate act to save that footage this reduces the liability that a dashboard camera can present in cases where it might have recorded something you might not want to become public. Furthermore dashboard cameras that do not record sound in the cabin are also preferable because the last thing you want is you on record being distracted by arguing with a passenger or switching radio station or bad mouthing some driver that cut you off and those things are considerably more common than people think.

TheSpiceIsLife 11y ago
A dashcam that overwrites footage in a short period may be of no use if you're unable to stop the recording because you've been injured in an accident. And anyway, if I'm at fault and that is recorded on the camera then that is okay with me. The camera will at least give an indisputable account of the events it recorded, whereas our human memories can be ... inaccurate.