4 ms·
On top of "garbage in, garbage out" I don't see how AI was destroyed. It functioned as intended; learned from Twitter and responded as intelligently as it could
by KON_Air 11y ago
On top of "garbage in, garbage out" I don't see how AI was destroyed. It functioned as intended; learned from Twitter and responded as intelligently as it could with the provided garbage. If it spewed Politically Correct garbage, would it have been a success?
- jordanb 11y agoClearly we need a Fourth Azimov's Law: No BigotBots.
- dclowd9901 11y agoTotalitarian authority over an AI's mind seems just as egregious as over a human's...
- Retra 11y agoThat might be true if an AI's needs were comparable to a human's. But the AI's we aim to develop wouldn't really face an existential crises when they go without food or sex. We can engineer an AI's needs. You might as well say it should be a crime to train puppies to do tricks.
- dave2000 11y agoIf "politically correct" means reasonable and respectful then it's not easy to see how that can be described as garbage. Given access to enough Twitter accounts and enough time the chances are good that eventually an ai bot might find tweets it might actually learn something from.
- V-2 11y agoIf "politically correct" means reasonable and respectful But it doesn't
- makomk 11y agoCertainly not on Twitter, where the moderators are so supportive of left-wing activists repeatedly telling people they disagree with to kill themselves that they ban the targets for talking about it and force them to delete their tweets complaining about it in order to be reinstated. Indeed, it probably wouldn't be politically viable for Twitter to do anything else in the current climate.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- V-2 11y agoIt's never been much of an "AI" to start with. This term is overused.