> Mostly I'm confused why a nearly 15 year old, poorly-written journal article appeared on HN today with no comments. Agreed, some context would be nice, and a

> Mostly I'm confused why a nearly 15 year old, poorly-written journal article appeared on HN today with no comments. Agreed, some context would be nice, and also agreed that it is poorly-written. I appreciate it much more when a paper I see on HN has some context from the submitter.