3 ms·
Looked. So what? There's a difference between "ugly" and "invalid". Both cases are bad but the first one has much more impact on end users. Edit to answer "how
by plugnburn 11y ago
Looked. So what? There's a difference between "ugly" and "invalid". Both cases are bad but the first one has much more impact on end users.
Edit to answer "how is it invalid": is this not enough? http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.ycombinator.com&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0 http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.ycombina...
- agumonkey 11y agoHow is it invalid ?
- agumonkey 11y agoThis is HN webpage, I meant the article page doctype. taken from w3c: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> article doctype: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
- plugnburn 11y agoI meant that website is probably valid but ugly, and HN page is vice versa.