JS is just a scapegoat here. Giving away a perfect valid package to a company without a legal order was lame. Unpublishing many packages without taking into co

JS is just a scapegoat here. Giving away a perfect valid package to a company without a legal order was lame. Unpublishing many packages without taking into consideration all dependents was lame. I can't help but think the people involved wouldn't repeat the very same decisions. Despite any amount of blame tossed around, this is a micro hickup in the thriving ecosystem around npm / Node / Javascript. This statement is backed by data http://npm-stat.com/charts.html?package=clone&author=&from=2014-03-28&to=2016-02-27 http://npm-stat.com/charts.html?package=clone&author=&from=2... Thanks to node, npm and amazing OSS devs, we can count on modular packages to get the job done faster on the client and server, and that's really valuable.