Well, the theme of the comments is: if google adds protection against certain adversaries (coffee shop wifi, MITMs, etc) via stricter TLS, but not all adversari

Well, the theme of the comments is: if google adds protection against certain adversaries (coffee shop wifi, MITMs, etc) via stricter TLS, but not all adversaries (nation-state attackers) via end-to-end, then the former protection is useless, I guess. It doesn't make sense to me, either.