5 ms·

Password manager for companies and startups

1 points by garakh 11y ago

garakh 11y ago
Level up company IT-security, reduces costs and hidden risks of password management. Company passwords are under control Passwork simplifies and streamlines work with passwords in a company. Passwork is like «Dropbox» for passwords. Users create groups and invite other users. Groups have folders structured with stored passwords. Users can always see the relevant data in their groups. Employees will never lose passwords, they can securely store and share them. Company administrators manage and track passwords access. Cloud and self-hosted editions. You can install Passwork on your own servers, managed exclusively by you. Open algorithms, open-source, API, and secure clien-side AES-256 encryption allow Passwork to guarantee 100% safety with password management within your company.
dozzie 11y ago
> Open source self-hosted enterprise password management solution for your company ... > Get a trial Doesn't look like open source. Regarding storing any sensitive information, I wouldn't touch it with a yard-long pole.
- garakh 11y ago
  It's not under opensource license it means that source codes of the self-hosted solution is auditable. So any solution owner can audite the sources and due to Passwork license even make changes.
  - dozzie 11y ago
    > It's not under opensource license it means that source codes of the self-hosted solution is auditable. So you're basically doing false advertising.
  - garakh 11y ago
    Microsoft used to call it «shared source» but to my mind they allow just to audite source codes without rights to change it. But anyway «shared source» is a complicated term, i suppose a lot of people have no idea what it means.
- garakh 11y ago
  Well, it's a question of terms. We have already faced this and some another people complained. And we understand the point. But there is a problem with «opensource» term. We have asked a lot of people and even IT guys and most of them (more than 80%) are sure that opensource means just auditable source. And just the minority knows the definition from opensource.org (which is actually has no jurisprudence approve). So we could write «auditable», «shared» or whatever else source but most people would be confused. We are going to update this page and add a FAQ with detailed explanation.

1 points by garakh 11y ago

Level up company IT-security, reduces costs and hidden risks of password management. Company passwords are under control Passwork simplifies and streamlines work with passwords in a company. Passwork is like «Dropbox» for passwords. Users create groups and invite other users. Groups have folders structured with stored passwords. Users can always see the relevant data in their groups. Employees will never lose passwords, they can securely store and share them. Company administrators manage and track passwords access. Cloud and self-hosted editions. You can install Passwork on your own servers, managed exclusively by you. Open algorithms, open-source, API, and secure clien-side AES-256 encryption allow Passwork to guarantee 100% safety with password management within your company.

dozzie 11y ago

> Open source self-hosted enterprise password management solution for your company ... > Get a trial Doesn't look like open source. Regarding storing any sensitive information, I wouldn't touch it with a yard-long pole.

garakh 11y ago
It's not under opensource license it means that source codes of the self-hosted solution is auditable. So any solution owner can audite the sources and due to Passwork license even make changes.
- dozzie 11y ago
  > It's not under opensource license it means that source codes of the self-hosted solution is auditable. So you're basically doing false advertising.
- garakh 11y ago
  Microsoft used to call it «shared source» but to my mind they allow just to audite source codes without rights to change it. But anyway «shared source» is a complicated term, i suppose a lot of people have no idea what it means.
garakh 11y ago
Well, it's a question of terms. We have already faced this and some another people complained. And we understand the point. But there is a problem with «opensource» term. We have asked a lot of people and even IT guys and most of them (more than 80%) are sure that opensource means just auditable source. And just the minority knows the definition from opensource.org (which is actually has no jurisprudence approve). So we could write «auditable», «shared» or whatever else source but most people would be confused. We are going to update this page and add a FAQ with detailed explanation.