4 ms·
> If you pay enough attention to the people who select but don't design ciphers --- ie, non-cryptographer engineers --- you're starting to hear more and more of
by CiPHPerCoder 11y ago
> If you pay enough attention to the people who select but don't design ciphers --- ie, non-cryptographer engineers --- you're starting to hear more and more of a drumbeat of "do whatever DJB says"; if you push those people to explain those decisions, you don't usually get good answers.
Sure. I like to call that condition "secure by default". Said engineers most often don't have a lot of knowledge and experience with cryptography, so they opt for the best option available. In a lot of cases, it's DJB's work. In other cases, it's someone who followed his example (e.g. the BLAKE(2) team).
Also, this might have had something to do with this shift towards the current situation:
https://gist.github.com/tqbf/be58d2d39690c3b366ad https://gist.github.com/tqbf/be58d2d39690c3b366ad
> Use, in order of preference: (1) The Nacl/libsodium default
> If you can just use Nacl, use Nacl. You don't even have to care what Nacl does.
- tptacek 11y agoI take your point, and the point of the sibling commenter. I just think Guttman is talking about a different kind of "DJB by default" phenomenon.
- CiPHPerCoder 11y agoI think you're right.