4 ms·
Exactly. Furthermore, you don't need to build life from scratch. That's wasteful. You'll just set yourself back years, possibly a decade or more, trying and err
by jonnathanson 11y ago
Exactly. Furthermore, you don't need to build life from scratch. That's wasteful. You'll just set yourself back years, possibly a decade or more, trying and erring until you get to roughly the same place as the stripped-down bacterial genome at which Venter and his colleagues have arrived.
Venter isn't explicitly trying to create life from scratch; he's trying to find the minimum viable platform from which to harness life for various useful purposes. Starting from the proverbial "pile of unrefined rock" would accomplish nothing but scoring a few vanity points.
- logfromblammo 11y agoYou would need to build divergent life from scratch if you wanted to prove you knew everything there is to know about how life works. As the synthetic genome shows, anyone who tried that today would end up 149 genes short of viability with too few clues for how to fix it.