> anything that's developed to the point where it actually works ceases to be "AI. Hmm, I've not heard of this happening. Do you have any examples of it? > In

> anything that's developed to the point where it actually works ceases to be "AI. Hmm, I've not heard of this happening. Do you have any examples of it? > In any case, it doesn't matter what you call it. Current research is producing results that can improve these systems, which means that research is worth a lot of money. I don't see how this really adds to or is relevant to my comment, I was simply restating and adding to hitekker's point that AI is improperly named.