> Sorry, I can't resist indulging in a moment of pedantry here. I've always got the impression that this is, rather than an abuse, instead an intentional re-pu

> Sorry, I can't resist indulging in a moment of pedantry here. I've always got the impression that this is, rather than an abuse, instead an intentional re-purposing of the slogan to convey exactly the meaning that it appears to have (instead of the one that it historically should). I'm a die-hard prescriptivist on most matters; but, since the sentiment that the grandparent expressed is common and the one the the literal historical slogan expresses doesn't seem to be, it's hard to see why we should cling to the latter and avoid the former.