3 ms·
This sounds like complete bullshit to me, and I find the the entire idea pretty reprehensible. But on the off chance that this helps someone whom is a survivor
by Eric_WVGG 11y ago
This sounds like complete bullshit to me, and I find the the entire idea pretty reprehensible. But on the off chance that this helps someone whom is a survivor of sexual assault and buys into the idea of trigger warnings, there perhaps ought to be a differentiation between "sex" and "sexual violence" or "rape"
- rmc 11y ago> there perhaps ought to be a differentiation between "sex" and "sexual violence" or "rape" I suspect the "sex", like "nudity", is really for prudes who don't like seeing any hint of anything.
- marco1 11y ago> there perhaps ought to be a differentiation between "sex" and "sexual violence" or "rape" Rape is "violence" and not "sex" in this classification. But this should be documented, of course. > This sounds like complete bullshit to me I don't understand how you come to this point of view. You might personally not be interested in this. But that's not what you wrote. Anyway, as you can see in the README, there are several commercial providers for such filtering, so it's obvious that there are people who want and need this.
- Eric_WVGG 11y agoI’m not arguing that there’s no market for this product* . I just find artistic censorship morally objectionable in much the same way that others find violent or sexual content abhorrent. Just on the other side of this particular culture war I guess. * surely plenty who want, but I disagree that anyone “needs”