The short answer is: it cuts both ways. "Intuition" (or more generally, associative thinking) can definitely lead us astray. So can (superficially) analytical

The short answer is: it cuts both ways. "Intuition" (or more generally, associative thinking) can definitely lead us astray. So can (superficially) analytical thinking that might appear to be based on a chain of logically sound, "if A, then B" statements but yet ultimately miss the bigger context, or otherwise just end up coming to warped or irrational conclusions. So both strains of thought are needed. Especially if we're to stand any chance at all against the robots.