i used the implication for dramatic and rhetorical effect, but i didn't call it gentrification either. ;) i agree that it isn't, since for the most part the n

i used the implication for dramatic and rhetorical effect, but i didn't call it gentrification either. ;) i agree that it isn't, since for the most part the new owners don't even live there and the previous owners were (basically) rich to begin with. it's basically just monopoly money being swapped around by rich people on two sides of the same ocean.