4 ms·
I was hoping that people here were more skeptical (EDIT: and less hysterical) than users in the forums of the local rags... Some are fond of perpetuating the n
by msie 11y ago
I was hoping that people here were more skeptical (EDIT: and less hysterical) than users in the forums of the local rags...
Some are fond of perpetuating the narrative that the city will be hollowed out with empty homes and locals fleeing the city. Yet a recent report to city hall reports that detached homes are not as vacant as "popularly" believed:
"The vacancy rate in Vancouver for single-family homes, duplexes and row houses is only about one per cent, and that rate has been static since 2002, according to the report. Meanwhile, the combined vacancy rate for condominiums and purpose-built rental apartments is 7.2 per cent. That number is in line with the findings of a 2013 study by the Urban Futures Institute, which put unoccupied apartments in Vancouver at 6.2 per cent on 2011 Census day."
Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/business/affordability/more+than+vancouver+condos+empty/11770403/story.html#ixzz43pviBP50 http://www.vancouversun.com/business/affordability/more+than...
- caffodian 11y agoThat study also had flaws, here is an article poking at it. Among other issues, excluding pre-demolition homes from the city-sponsored study doesn't make sense. http://www.scmp.com/comment/blogs/article/1926280/vancouvers-vacancy-study-key-finding-it-didnt-find-and-vacant-homes-it http://www.scmp.com/comment/blogs/article/1926280/vancouvers... As someone living here, one big problem is that there is far too much noise - too many studies and bad articles (like the original one here.) There's obviously problems but everyone is running around chasing the hot topic of the day ("shadow flipping," for example) as the various governments either pretend it's not a problem, or sponsor yet another flawed study on it.