4 ms·
Robin Murphy has been doing reacue robots her whole career. Her team had robots at the WTC site. Very few people know more about this area than her. It's appro
by robotresearcher 11y ago
Robin Murphy has been doing reacue robots her whole career. Her team had robots at the WTC site. Very few people know more about this area than her.
It's appropriate to be skeptical of course, but don't dismiss the expertise of someone before looking them up.
- throwaway287391 11y agoI really don't understand where GP's comment comes from...you don't even need to look her up; Robin Murphy's byline in the article itself makes it clear that she is a CS professor who directs a center for robotics. How could you possibly compare somebody with that set of credentials commenting on robotics to a "physicist speaking on literature or history"? As someone who's typically a bit skeptical of such allegations, the only explanation for GP's comment I can come up with is sexism... (But I'd be interested to hear any more charitable interpretations or an explanation from the comment's author -- I'm really pretty baffled by the comment.)
- conceit 11y agoBecause econ is usually a different faculty
- throwaway287391 11y ago...what? She is a professor of CS & Engineering according to the byline in the article, and upon Googling her, I find no reference to her teaching economics or any other non-CS/Engineering discipline elsewhere. And unless ctrl+f is failing me, "econ" isn't mentioned anywhere in the article (except "economically" once in someone else's comment) or in this comment thread. So I have no idea what you're talking about.
- conceit 11y agoShe talks about econ and, as you diligently pointed out, that's not her area of expertise, exactly. OTOH I would assume that a professional does have a clue about adjacent topics.