5 ms·
Broadly speaking you're right, but in London in particular housing stock growth has been significant in the last 10 years but it has had consequently little eff
by Joe8Bit 11y ago
Broadly speaking you're right, but in London in particular housing stock growth has been significant in the last 10 years but it has had consequently little effect on housing price deflation[0].
There are many theories as to why that is, but a personal pet one is that London is lacking in housing stock across the market and as such it is economically more viable to build at the middle and top end of the market where profits are higher than at the low end. When this is combined with a record low investment in local government social housing in London you get London's extreme housing market e.g. demand is high, but supply has all gravitated to the place where returns are highest
[0]: http://data.london.gov.uk/housingmarket/ http://data.london.gov.uk/housingmarket/
- ido 11y agoVery dense residential areas still seem rare in London, compared to other cities of comparable size (it has lower population density than e.g. NYC, Paris, Hong Kong, Seoul, Tokyo...)
- Joe8Bit 11y agoCompletely agree. London really needs to embrace 'up' as a viable building solution. Apparently, a lot of it has to do with some archaic laws surrounding building in London, the 'Protected Views' one is of particular note: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_view https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_view