5 ms·
On the other hand, no one can reclaim a tweet after it's been yanked. So, `require from tweet` is a safer system for your production systems.
by ghayes 11y ago
On the other hand, no one can reclaim a tweet after it's been yanked. So, `require from tweet` is a safer system for your production systems.
- jsprogrammer 11y agoTwitter API clients are required to delete all copies of tweet contents when a tweet is yanked, or Twitter will revoke API access, which might bring your production systems to a deserved halt.
- jamstruth 11y agoYes but they won't accidentally pull a malicious version of the tweet pretending to be the original. They'll just stop working
- jsprogrammer 11y agoThat is an unacceptable outcome for production systems.
- Navarr 11y agoReading the NPM blog today - that's not really a problem in NPM. Reclaiming a module name requires a breaking version for any new code, so it shouldn't be an issue there.
- bronson 11y agoIt's still an issue for any developers who use '>' instead of '~' or 'x'. That's quite a few.