3 ms·
> A more common one is "damaging and destructive" That's a baseless assertion. Just because you developed a distaste for a particular programming paradigm it
by bubuga 11y ago
> A more common one is "damaging and destructive"
That's a baseless assertion. Just because you developed a distaste for a particular programming paradigm it doesn't mean that your baseless assertions are suddenly sound.
> So, sticking to a paradigm that does not work
Somehow, the software world is founded on something that you somehow claim doesn't work.
Perhaps you've taken your pet peeve a bit too far.
- sklogic 11y ago> That's a baseless assertion. That's a verifiable fact. Take any OO code-base and it's very obvious how destructive the choice to use OO was, because there is always a much better model than OO. But of course you zealots are not even competent enough to comprehend such simple things.