The 'fire and brimstone' commment was responding the comment about an 'open-source project' bearing the same name. Which is not unreasonable. That moved the di

The 'fire and brimstone' commment was responding the comment about an 'open-source project' bearing the same name. Which is not unreasonable. That moved the discussion from a single module to an entire project. Furthermore, since companies are actually required to enforce trademarks, the comment is nothing more of a reminder of what would necessarily have to happen. It's not like they could just ask the lawyers not to enforce the trademark.