3 ms·
If you don't want to implement it - it's fine, don't, I understand it. This tool should be used for ad-hoc commands and there are some other tools that already
by nikolay 11y ago
If you don't want to implement it - it's fine, don't, I understand it. This tool should be used for ad-hoc commands and there are some other tools that already use an index, which means that I'm not the only one who thinks a little addition like is useful.
As previously covered multiple times, some innovative startups don't even enable SSH for their servers as SSH doesn't fit nicely in the immutable infrastructure paradigm.
But then there's the real world.
- toomuchtodo 11y ago> If you don't want to implement it - it's fine, don't, I understand it. If you want to address a unique instance, do it by instance ID. If you want to address all of them, use the command example Mike put forth. To add an index is redundant. Use fabric if you're interested in that level of control. Not SSHing to your instances works just fine, until you need to tweak a knob without launching a new instance, or get logs that you didn't know you needed to get. If you feel the need to get on the immutable infrastructure hype train though, go for it.