"When recruiters get 30% of an employee's yearly salary as a finder's fee, higher liquidity tends to decrease the pool of money available to employees" Be hone

"When recruiters get 30% of an employee's yearly salary as a finder's fee, higher liquidity tends to decrease the pool of money available to employees" Be honest, it's not like that money would have gone to the employees anyway. "While, yes, changing jobs for you personally might be good in some situations, promoting "labor liquidity" is a bad thing as a whole, for both employers and employees, in a sort of "tragedy of the commons" way." No it's not. Promoting that liquidity also means that, when one is mistreated at a job, they can easily find another.