> The process of scientific discussion (that you "don't trust") is just how science works. The invisibility of the data upon which papers rely is one of the ke

> The process of scientific discussion (that you "don't trust") is just how science works. The invisibility of the data upon which papers rely is one of the key weaknesses of science as currently practiced, as it makes verification of analysis impossible. I don't think it has to be "how science works", and in fact I hope that science moves away from such opacity to requiring data to be published alongside papers.