3 ms·
I suspect this criticism usually comes from people who don't use Nim because anyone inclined to be bothered by it will not use Nim for that reason. I agree tha
by gjm11 11y ago
I suspect this criticism usually comes from people who don't use Nim because anyone inclined to be bothered by it will not use Nim for that reason.
I agree that "just keep a consistent style" is a good approach for single-person projects. It's harder to keep it working well as you get more people working on the code, though.
- progman 11y agoActually Nim's attitude is more suitable for group work because every group can have its own style of coding. A simple transformer could be used to normalize the code. However it would force the developers to qualify all imported conflicting names which is a good idea anyway. You cannot do this in C++ and Rust. There you actually have to keep a consistent style.