Wait, what? You base your argument for disagreeing with the study on a documentary? You're aware that as bad as the standards for social sciences are, they stil

Wait, what? You base your argument for disagreeing with the study on a documentary? You're aware that as bad as the standards for social sciences are, they still run circles around the standards for documentaries, right? And you're aware that the core part of that documentary is based on an (AFAIK) unreproduced study on psychopathy - by somebody who likely has a vested interest in psychopathy being a problem. (Robert Hare - see www.hare.org) I'm all for questioning the accuracy of studies, but I'd hope we'd use somewhat higher standards than that.