3 ms·

We're going to make this free for personal uses but not sure at this time what licensing model we should adopt.

• ssatta 11y ago
  As long as 'free for personal use' means 'closed source' then at least I would have a hard time trusting a tool backing up personal files into public cloud storage without transparency about how the crypto is implemented. I suspect that may also be the case for much of your 'personal use' target audience.
  • acrosync 11y ago
    Since most HN commenters are concerned about the source code availability, we'll definitely reconsider the licensing model.
    • lewisl9029 11y ago
      Please do! The product & tech looks very promising. I'd hate to have to cross it off my shortlist due to trust issues.
      • ssatta 11y ago
        Indeed please do! You're definitely scratching a very real itch here.
        • gaboose 10y ago
          A thought: Do you think people would pay collectively (given the chance) like a fundraiser to publish the source, when a certain limit is reached? Maybe even pay the developer's bills that way? I wonder..