> not an unprovable absolute claim that Picasso has not produced any artwork since he has died That is not what you originally said. You said: > Not one new a

> not an unprovable absolute claim that Picasso has not produced any artwork since he has died That is not what you originally said. You said: > Not one new artwork is produced by still allowing copyright on Picasso's artwork. I pointed out that the same copyright terms which apply to Picasso's works may motivate some artist, somewhere, to create "one new artwork" which he wouldn't have otherwise.