3 ms·
I think people are going to take it in baby steps. There are a lot of advantages to simply owning a car. If you aren't in a dense city, they vastly outweigh the
by SerLava 11y ago
I think people are going to take it in baby steps. There are a lot of advantages to simply owning a car. If you aren't in a dense city, they vastly outweigh the hassles inherent in any type of non-owned transportation.
People really are short on time. Waiting for the vehicle and even having to stand outside aren't great - you may even have to worry a bit more about the clothes you're wearing in the heat or cold. It's the little taxes on everything.
Plus whenever you share a ride, someone's going to have to take a detour of some distance.
- awjr 11y agoMany of those things are overcome-able. For example you could ask for a car to get you to X by Y time. You will then be informed when that car will pick you up. You can then accept that ride or choose a more direct and expensive option. Considering you will be able to see on your smartphone exactly where your ride is and when it will be at your destination, you should be able to walk straight out of your home and step into the vehicle. I'm not precluding the fact that rural/suburbs will still have people owning and using cars, however looking just at the UK, as public transport (buses) have scaled back in the rural space to save money, car ownership has gone up. In cities, car ownership is dropping, but public transport is better supported. A rural public transport system that allows an "on-demand" service where you can be taken directly to the bus stop you want to go to, rather than into a central point, where you have to change onto another bus to get to the place you want to will no longer happen. Yes you will still have such systems in cities as they obviously work but I see public transport in less dense areas becoming more of a "grid" solution. There will no longer be a bus schedule. You will just use your smart device to request a service from A to B with an arrival time.