> I think snake_case is more readable than CamelCase... It might actually be more readable. See Sharif & Maletic (2010) [0]. Unfortunately, like many studies

> I think snake_case is more readable than CamelCase... It might actually be more readable. See Sharif & Maletic (2010) [0]. Unfortunately, like many studies of its kind, it suffers from a tiny sample size and various experimental flaws. However, I still think it's interesting, and I think this kind of research is very important---if only it could draw more funding! [0]: http://www.cs.kent.edu/~jmaletic/papers/ICPC2010-CamelCaseUnderScoreClouds.pdf http://www.cs.kent.edu/~jmaletic/papers/ICPC2010-CamelCaseUn...