27 ms·

I feel old; I used a Wyse 320 and later a VT220 as my sole / main IO device in 1995-96 - connected to a SPARCstation 10 via a multi-port serial box at 9600 baud

by mrbill 11y ago

I feel old; I used a Wyse 320 and later a VT220 as my sole / main IO device in 1995-96 - connected to a SPARCstation 10 via a multi-port serial box at 9600 baud, with heavy use of GNU Screen. Even now, I still use a variation on that - a tall terminal window, ssh, and screen - for the majority of my work.

vt240 11y ago
I really liked the Wyse 320? and used it for years until CRT died. It seemed to have the most diverse emulation support. Same deal with vt320 and HP 700/96 I just got tried of working on the CRTs all the time. Now I just use ZOC.
protomyth 11y ago
Well, I've used the Z19, IBM 5150, and VT 220 & 240 in my early years, so your among other late 80s / early 90s terminal room dwellers. I still have a green screen terminal configure on my Mac. Although, I have switched to yellow text / red background for production and blue background for test environments. Keeps one from doing really stupid things.
technofiend 11y ago
LOL. What's old is new again, mate. When I worked at Shell in 1989 and 1990 we were going to throw out Sun 3 desktops as underpowered and useless. Instead I convinced them to recycle the 3/50s and 3/60s as X terminals by replacing init and booting straight into X. You could use local X terms and telnet (ssh? what's that?) to systems, but we found it was faster to use XDM and supply the desktop from a server like a Sun 4/280. I would kill to have a modern-day equivalent of the native UNIX desktop I had on a 4/110 after we ditched the 3/50's: the system had two frame buffers and you could switch between desktops by crossing the desktop boundary in any direction. Probably easier to just use two screens these days but at the time that meant putting two extremely large and deep CRTs on your desk. Here we are 25 years later and xterm+ssh is still the easiest way to get my UNIX work done even if everything else (e-mail, productivity apps) is in Windows. Where's my modern-day NCD X terminal equivalent and unix desktop?

by mrbill 11y ago

vt240 11y ago

I really liked the Wyse 320? and used it for years until CRT died. It seemed to have the most diverse emulation support. Same deal with vt320 and HP 700/96 I just got tried of working on the CRTs all the time. Now I just use ZOC.

protomyth 11y ago

Well, I've used the Z19, IBM 5150, and VT 220 & 240 in my early years, so your among other late 80s / early 90s terminal room dwellers. I still have a green screen terminal configure on my Mac. Although, I have switched to yellow text / red background for production and blue background for test environments. Keeps one from doing really stupid things.

technofiend 11y ago

LOL. What's old is new again, mate. When I worked at Shell in 1989 and 1990 we were going to throw out Sun 3 desktops as underpowered and useless. Instead I convinced them to recycle the 3/50s and 3/60s as X terminals by replacing init and booting straight into X. You could use local X terms and telnet (ssh? what's that?) to systems, but we found it was faster to use XDM and supply the desktop from a server like a Sun 4/280. I would kill to have a modern-day equivalent of the native UNIX desktop I had on a 4/110 after we ditched the 3/50's: the system had two frame buffers and you could switch between desktops by crossing the desktop boundary in any direction. Probably easier to just use two screens these days but at the time that meant putting two extremely large and deep CRTs on your desk. Here we are 25 years later and xterm+ssh is still the easiest way to get my UNIX work done even if everything else (e-mail, productivity apps) is in Windows. Where's my modern-day NCD X terminal equivalent and unix desktop?