Depending on the system you use to view the text, many of the characters are actually printed using non-Roman lookalike characters that still render as the "usu

Depending on the system you use to view the text, many of the characters are actually printed using non-Roman lookalike characters that still render as the "usual" ones. In OSX / Firefox I see the usual text in the web view, but in source view there's a variation in shading between characters, in what should be an unadorned monospaced font. Viewing the same source in Chrome shows the trick for what it is... https://www.dropbox.com/s/oj9cqlh3kh90zep/Screenshot%202016-03-22%2016.15.36.png?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/oj9cqlh3kh90zep/Screenshot%202016-... Subtle and not always visible due to differences in display normalization in various libraries? Way out of my depth for system fonts / encoding issues. But hopefully the above shows what I'm talking about. Could there be some data hidden in the lookalike string values? http://www.lookout.net/2012/04/generating-confusable-lookalike-strings.html http://www.lookout.net/2012/04/generating-confusable-lookali...