4 ms·
Less than amazing. This pancake got "95% moon" and nothing else: http://www.hoborecipes.com/images/pancake.png http://www.hoborecipes.com/images/pancake.png
by femto113 11y ago
Less than amazing. This pancake got "95% moon" and nothing else: http://www.hoborecipes.com/images/pancake.png http://www.hoborecipes.com/images/pancake.png
- femto113 11y agoIt does recognize these however: https://yurielkaim.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Why-You-Shouldnt-Eat-Pancakes-for-Breakfast.jpg https://yurielkaim.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Why-You-Sh... This is the biggest gap I find in existing classifiers, the inability to make leaps from trained images (stack of pancakes) to others (single pancake) that are trivial for humans. I suspect this is because most scoring algorithms for rating classifiers don't appropriately penalize absurdly wrong answers, so what we wind up with are systems that are simply very good at matching a new image to a similar reference image, rather than really "figuring out" what the picture is of.
- pdw 11y agoIt has no clue what a tree is: https://i.imgur.com/UTPTvd9.png https://i.imgur.com/UTPTvd9.png