3 ms·
We're always going to need some prisons. Because as much as many people are possible to rehabilitate, there's always going to be a (rather small) percentage th
by CM30 11y ago
We're always going to need some prisons. Because as much as many people are possible to rehabilitate, there's always going to be a (rather small) percentage that are simply dangerous to just about everyone and everything around them. See, some of the worst examples of serial killers. You don't really want to risk the possibility of letting them near anyone else, and house arrest (or a traditional psychiatric ward) might not be secure enough in a few cases...
But we should be sending a far lower percentage of criminals to prison, yes.
On another note, could virtual reality potentially be an interesting punishment here? There are a few articles online about the possibility of having someone experience what feels like 10,000 years in 8 hours, and the concept could potentially be used for literal imprisonment too (like say, in The Matrix). You could give someone who's simply impossible to rehabitate a virtual life that fits their own worldview...
- Retric 11y agoThat sounds more like we need insane asylums not prisons. Politically we find it easier to deal with people that can't function in society as criminal than sick and historically Insane Asylums have been really nasty places. However, I don't see the advantage of keeping criminals in the same place as the insane.
- screaminghawk 11y agoI agree we should be sending less people to prison. But then the problem becomes how to punish people for doing these things? Some people do not have the money to pay compensation. Some people will avoid community service. Some people will disobey home detention orders. What do we do with these people now?