I admire this guy's confidence, but that's just a clear cut imitation of facebook. As other people mentioned, the people who use myspace don't want myspace to

I admire this guy's confidence, but that's just a clear cut imitation of facebook. As other people mentioned, the people who use myspace don't want myspace to look like facebook. They want it to look however they want it to (which could be tied back to the name of the site). Clearly what needs to be redesigned is the backend, not the frontend. As far as I know, customization of a myspace page (beyond setting a background image) is still only possible by referencing esoteric, undocumented css classes and id's. I can't even fathom the number of ridiculous hacks it takes to create a myspace page like this: http://www.myspace.com/attackattack http://www.myspace.com/attackattack No, I don't listen to that band. However, I have a good feeling that everything on that page was created and tested extensively by someone from Vans Warped Tour. Most of the elements are shared among various bands who are all playing in Warped this year. And while a team of people probably took a week to make all of that work, one guy could have gotten it done in a day using straight html and css. My band has a myspace page, and people have offered to customize our page for a modest $100. And I don't exaggerate when I say this: $100 is probably a deal. One of two things has to happen. Either the bugs allowing customization need to be fixed, or customization needs to be supported legitimately. It's as if the creators just threw the site into NewsCorp's lap, and it hasn't been touched since.