3 ms·
Alupis wrote: "Average users who just consume distro's are not going to switch to a new unproven CoreUtils (even if they knew how), and distro maintainers are n
by Santosh83 11y ago
Alupis wrote:
"Average users who just consume distro's are not going to switch to a new unproven CoreUtils (even if they knew how), and distro maintainers are not going to switch until it's proven either. It will take a huge company with a huge install-base switching and testing it in production for many years before others start to feel comfortable... however this is also an enormous burden on said mega-corporation, for little-to-zero perceived benefits."
Seems like this is a good opportunity for Mozilla to demonstrate the resilience of Rust and its ecosystem by adopting Rust as the language of choice, where possible, and deploying in-house a custom Linux system in which Rust-written components are plugged-in, as and when they are written and ready, with perhaps a full-fledged switch to Redox sometime in the future. If Rust and software written in it are pushed to their limits within Mozilla, then its not an unreasonable recommendation for it to be deployed on an even wider scale.
- Manishearth 11y ago> deploying in-house a custom Linux system in which Rust-written components are plugged-in I don't see Mozilla doing this, really. There's no direct benefit, and there's a nebulous future benefit for Rust. Mozilla is using Rust components in Firefox though (as well as Servo being mostly Rust). "Adopting Rust as the language of choice" seems to be happening already -- I've heard a lot of folks enthusiastic about (re)writing in Rust. This stuff takes time, though.